The Coalition Government ; Time To Reshuffle

Frm L-R: Education Sec Gove, Business Sec Cable,
Chancellor Osborne & PM Cameron

Well, one year after the Coalition government came into operation in the UK, one is reflecting on the bumping drive and how aching everyone is.

Agreed that they don’t have a mandate – well, a campaigned one – it should have given them a leeway to do just about anything after all… and they have towed that path.

Yet, what has been more clear than a spring water is the fact that some or most of the Cabinet members seem to be very inefficient – mind you, inefficient, not unintelligent – even in filling that blank canvass.

Obama Sets Clear Pathway On What Next Election is Fought On; Cameron?

It seems Barrack Obama’s ambition for a second term is working out for him. Because just as American politics is turning the sharp bend into another ferocious contest for the Oval Office, the man most analyst were wondering if he could be a one-term president seems to be hitting the jackpot: killed Osama; at least, after as we are meant to believe for now… to infinity until instructed otherwise.

Going on with that, he has followed it up with a stubborn decisive strategy to pull out of Afghanistan. And not just pull out, but in just about two years.

The America president seems to have identified his luck; and is doing all within his power to use all available stakes. These two actions alone, it seems, would buy him a huge pack of votes from many Americans most of which would prefer that their government is not warring anywhere.

I can see the ‘Yes, we can!’ slogan returning and the forthcoming campaign focusing on security. Opponents may try to pitch it on the economy but with a seemingly progressing security campaign – at least succeeding on the path of leftist agenda – Mr Obama is bound to assure liberal Americans that money saved from the reduced military missions can boost the economy; clever git.

What A Bollocks?

"Given some of those people with a learning disability clearly, by definition, cannot be as productive in their work as somebody who has not got a disability of that nature, then it was inevitable given the employer was going to have to pay them both the same they were going to take on the person who was going to be more productive, less of a risk,"  RIDICULOUS!!!

How could anyone with a brain and sense of respect and reality say such arrant nonsense? That was Philip Davies, Conservative Member of Parliament for Shipley ranting about his concern for people with disability and why they should accept to be underpaid for competition sake.

But  what Mr Davies fail to understand is that people ‘without’ disability are as much risk to an employer, and even much more than an employee with disability. In fact, if any employer approach it the way dunce Mr Davies puts it; i.e. sitting two people down to select based on disability, most would go for someone with disability who can work.

Mr Davies’ proposal re-enforces stereotypes and advocates abuse and manipulation