The Julian Assange’s Sex Case: Imagine If He Had Been A Gay Man

Well, apart from the obvious sins against the gods of the earth for trying to expose them and their real thoughts? But anyway, the real story is rather much complicated when overturned.

Sex is the assumed evil which most ‘holier-than-thou’ heterosexual people verily hold against gay people. To them, being gay equals promiscuity and even being a sex predator. In cases, it has been seen where institutions, especially schools and the likes immediately ask employees to reconsider their place once it is learnt they are gay.

But here we see a heterosexual man in sex with different women [within a short space of time]. Not that it is an issue in the actual sense of it, after all, they are adults and I supposed, have carried out their fun in the privacy of their rooms. But what if the entire story was to be overturned and looked at from the homosexuality

Vince Cable’s Sell-Out On The Coalition: Smells A Fish

The reported backbiting by the Business Secretary in the UK Coalition government raises a kind of dust. And considering who is reporting, it begs for further weighing. Is there something we are not seeing?

For the famous Tory-graph (Telegraph) to be reporting something on the Coalition in this manner, it bothers on the fact that they have probably and finally been bought over.

The purported report script seems like another ‘Trick’ being used to shore up the image of the Liberal Democrats mainly towards their supporters. This is especially so since after the Tuition Fees disaster.

In redeeming the image of Clegg and his co-Sell outs in the Lib Dem rank, the Coalition government seems to have agreed to use all tactics possible in making people think otherwise.

These tricks has included the

The Coalition Government Blame And Trick Tactics

By now, any observers would have understood the system of the UK Coalition government; it seems quite easy once critically analysed. The style is blame and trick of course…

The blame tactics is very common and we are all used to it… in fact, it is so obvious even idiots now found it very boring.

But the trick tactics, just like tricks is quite cunning and very subtly pervasive. Instances of it abound since even before the election was complete. The list below shows the few places where either or both styles has been applied:

• Forgemasters: Blame was used to cut off Loan; Trick is being applied applied to use it to dampen tuition fees mistake by the Liberal Democrats.
• Milk for children in school: Blame was used by Anne Milton to want to cancel this. Trick was used by the Prime Minister to re-instate it.
• Defence budget cut: Blame was used by Liam Fox to attack this and Trick was used by Prime Minister to defend it.
• Tuition fees: Blame was used on this… we may see Trick in the future used.
• Bankers: Blame was used to ignore this. Now Trick is being applied to use it to dampen and divert Tuition fees anger.
• EU Referendum: Trick was used to start this. Blame was later used to stop it.
• NHS Budget: was ring-fenced by Trick. Blame is being used to do the opposite now.
• Education budget: same as above

But everyone wants the government to succeed thus it amounts to folly that the same government would chose ‘hide-and-seek’ to be relating with her people.

But the people are beginning to understand and will learn not to trust the government.

FIFA’s Corruption Is Not Only Financial But Also Discrimination

Blatter's remarks on gay people blurs FIFA

For all that you would expect an international organisation to be, discrimination would have no place on your wildest imagination. In fact, not just would you expect them to be tolerant, but also to stand up against discrimination and any ill that separate people.

But FIFA’s president has confirmed through his foolish remark about gay people – call it a joke or ‘passing’ – that FIFA, at least if not the organisation, its operators are a bunch of ill-mannered miscreants. Sepp Blatter’s remark could not have been worse considering his position and the organisation that is entrusted(?) to him and his cronies to run.

Media investigation has always pointed that they are financially corrupt right from his first election as FIFA’s president. And now, behold, the man has also confirmed that he is homophobic and discriminatory.

Mr. Blatter’s remark that gay people “should refrain from any sexual activities” is as odd and stigmatising as any homophobic attack. Mr. Blatter is not only saying that gay people should not refrain from sexual activities, he is in reality saying that they should not be themselves by doing ordinary things that other people do, like hold hands or express themselves or their opinion openly or be camp. He is saying gay people, couples or not should not try to book or share hotel rooms, they should not dine out together in a romantic way, they should not

Two Men, Two Extradition Requests, Similar Offence, Different Outcome. Why?

So the Metropolitan Police in London received two extradition requests/orders in a space of one week; one from Sweden and the other from South Africa both demanding the handover of 2 men for offences related to women.

However, for one of the men, he has threatened the powers of world by exposing them and that power is furious. So like the wrath of God, the power must have its way and that man must not escape the wrath. All his sins must be brought to bear, spread out, conjured; even it means propaganda; if only to make him sound as guilty as Lucifer.

Julian Assange; accused of rape

In response to the Swedish extradition request for one of the men, the Wikileaks director Julian Assange was arrested by the London Metropolitan for a second questioning on accusation of rape of two women. Mr. Assange is still in detention and refused bail.

Although the case has been put on trial before and dropped by the Swedish authorities, it is bizarre and raises a lot of curiosity as to why an extradition has to be issued at the same time as Wikileaks was releasing the US Cables. Sweden can never escape complicity with American authorities who seem hell-bent on intimidating Wikileaks and currently threatening hell and brimstone.


But in response to the South African extradition request for the second of the men, Mr. Shrien Dewani, a British man who went on a honeymoon trip with his wife is facing exactly the same fate – at least in process – in a similar case.


Shrien is accused of killing his wife in a carjacking attempt in South Africa. The said taxi driver has given witness against Shrien. While the two men who ambushed the car has already been prosecuted and jailed.


In what seems like another version of the case involving Julian Assange, the South African Authorities has issued an extradition request/order for Shrien to return to face the guns for his wife’s case. 


However, as you may not imagine, Shrien who is accused of MURDER is granted bail but Julian, who is accused of RAPE is refused bail. Both men were arrested by the same authority in response to the same request and in the same week. Not that Shrien shouldn’t be granted bail, the question is why couldn’t Julian be treated in the same manner? 


What has changed and why the double treatment? Does the UK not have a process to deal with issues or are the police chiefs in UK a law unto themselves? 


In conclusion, it is either that the UK authority is responding appropriately to the Swedish authority because they are fellow Europeans hence ignoring the South African authorities by snubbing them and granting the other man a bail; they can call their bluff.


Or the UK authority is playing alongside America and Sweden ignoring their own procedure so to intimidate freedom of speech and uphold censorship by holding on to Julian Assange while following appropriate procedure in the South African request and releasing the other man who also has not been charged for any murder.

Wikileaks Exposes The Oppressions We Call Democracies.

While it could be thought on this blog that Wikileak’s US Cable materials are very interesting but of no decisive public interest, it is not in any way to think that governments, especially that of America is right in any way either to persecute Wikileaks or its owners in the way we have seen recently.

Indeed, an open government is what we all vote for and want... is it too much to ask for?

What baffles so much is; if America (and all other) government do not have anything to hide, why all the maddening and irrational attack to the point of seeking the head of Julian Assange, Wikileaks owner on a plate?

But these materials and their details may not be in public interest and as such does not pose any dangers whatsoever as America tend to claim. However, and even if so, Mr. Assange or Wikileaks has not done anything such as deserve this persecution. And where the government of America thinks Assange has done wrong, due process should be followed.

Justice or Jump-in?

It is completely shameful and disappointing that American politicians would be the one behaving worse than some proclaimed dictators… even Saddam Hussein would not react in this irate dragon style.

This whole ruction has revived the knowledge of internet wiz kids on what life really is. It is a pity that most of them were living in the fantasy that the

Wikileaks: These Materials May Be Of Interest But Obviously Not In The Public Interest

Many liberal thinkers and freedom fighters will support the openness that Wikileaks is insisting that governments across the world should have. However, the disagreement is whether the recent revelations are any useful towards peace ...

In the light of developments in the Middle East in the last decade and the handling of them by the so-called West, USA and Britain in the forefront, many people of fair standing had decried the self-actualizations that accompanied these actions.

So riding on the back of all that, most people would think secrecy isnt acceptable in dealing with the issues but only on the merit that those accused should be treated fairly and in public courts as innocent until found guilty. These demands all rest on the wish for the respect of civil liberties.

So the innumerable tons of materials now in the public domain which includes private conversations, governments’ businesses and briefings leaves so much to be desired. Do we, the ordinary people who demand freedom, civil liberty and fairness, really want this much information? Are they of use and would they really help the cause we want to pursue?

Come to think of it, Wikileaks documents are of interest but obviously not